A PUBLIC ROUTE FOR CORRECTION
Feedback & corrections
The fastest way to improve a research programme is to make specific problems easy to report. Please include the public page, paper or passage concerned.
A mathematical or theoretical error
Please identify the statement, argument or formal result that appears wrong. I will investigate, correct the public record when needed, and clearly mark a withdrawal when a released claim cannot stand. This is an academic-integrity matter independent of AI use.
A readability or missing-step problem
If the text is difficult to follow, skips a step a human reader needs, or leaves the scope unclear, please point to the passage. Readability is a publication requirement because these materials are meant to carry knowledge.
AI-shaped wording
You are welcome to flag formulaic or distracting AI-shaped wording. I will weigh whether changing it improves scientific communication and value; literary polish alone does not decide every edit.
A disagreement with AI-assisted research
I respect the view that research should be conducted more cautiously or without AI. I do not treat that disagreement as a request to change this research method. I believe responsible participation means studying the boundaries of a powerful technology, while respecting human intelligence and the different roles that careful critics and practical researchers can play.
For a direct contact route, reach Alex Chengyu Li through the public profile. LinkedIn